Competitive Livestock Systems in the context of climate change

Strategies to improve feed digestibility and decrease enteric fermentation resulted in lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Central America

Context of the story

Enteric fermentation (methane) is the main source of GHG emissions. The most productive farms had lower emissions due to their mitigation strategies, such as supplementing with high-quality forages and using improved pastures. Although 88% of producers do not have any manure management plan at all, some farms use it for biogas or biofertilizer production. These strategies are especially important in the current context where there is no differentiated price for products produced in a more environmentally friendly manner.

GHG sources

The implemented initiative

The first phase of the project consisted of the analysis of GHG emissions and livestock farms' profitability. Then, nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions were experimentally quantified. To estimate GHG, all emissions generated inside and outside of the farms were taken into consideration. For consistency, all GHG emissions were expressed as CO2e.

Farm management as a tool to reduce GHG

The technological solution

Farms with lower intensification only have grazing systems and generate more CH4 emissions than higher intensified farms. In contrast, farms with greater intensification systems have feeding strategies such as supplementing lactating cows with commercial concentrates, minerals, and silages. Furthermore, they tend to implement more management strategies such as pasture management plans, soil analysis, technical fertilization recommendations, rest periods, proper animal load and type of grasses and legumes usage. All these strategies result in greater milk production per cow and lower CH4 emission per liter of milk produced.

Results

Enteric fermentation is the main source of livestock emission. Farms less intensified only have grazed animals and generate 103% more methane emissions than more intensified farms that supplement with forage banks and concentrates. Furthermore, more intensified farms produce an average of 2.1 more liters of milk per cow.

Relevant data

Farms GHG sources

Farms for CO2 base line quantification
-
Farms for CO2 base line quantification
Professionals trained
-
Professionals trained
Undergraduate and graduate level thesis
-
Undergraduate and graduate level thesis

Graphics

Better management practices and silvopastoral systems

Better management practices and silvopastoral systems

Participating Organizations

Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE) - Costa Rica
Dirección de Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria (DICTA) - Honduras
 Instituto de Investigación Agropecuaria de Panamá (IDIAP) - Panamá
Instituto Nacional de Innovación y Transferencia en Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) - Costa Rica
Instituto Nicaragüense de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) - Nicaragua

Main donors

FONTAGRO
Ministry for Primary Industries NZ
BID
FONTAGRO
© FONTAGRO | 1300 New York Avenue NW, Stop W0502 Washington, DC 20577
E-mail: fontagro@iadb.org